BloFin: what the sources say
No MiCA authorization found Limited search: no Rigor score
Regulation, reserves, fees
Reserves note: No third-party auditor named on the page. BTC-ECHO mentions a PoR process via Fireblocks as the provider's claim.
Incidents and regulator actions found
Security incidents
- No incident found in our limited search.
Regulator and court actions
- No regulator or court action found in our limited search.
What we could not verify
Searched incidents/legal (1 search + page reads; no BloFin-specific incident or action found; empty lists = none found, not proof of none). Fees from third-party review. Entity country, licences, Italy/OAM, official fee page, PoR liabilities/auditor left null/unclear.
Facts are as of 9 Oct 2026. We ran a limited number of searches per exchange, so an empty list is not proof that nothing happened. We did not check the Italian OAM register. Items from press or third parties are reports, not findings by an authority. If something here is wrong or out of date, send a correction with a source: corrections policy. Education only, not investment advice.
Sources
- [1] ESMA interim MiCA CASP register (CSV) accessed 2026-10-09
- [2] BloFin Support - Proof of Reserves accessed 2026-10-09
- [3] BTC-ECHO - BloFin review (third-party, page dated 2026-06-02) accessed 2026-10-09
- [4] HackenProof - BloFin bug bounty program accessed 2026-10-09
- [5] Apple App Store - BloFin accessed 2026-10-09