Bitunix: what the sources say

Regulation, reserves, fees

Reserves note: PoR page defines reserve ratio = funds on platform / funds of users and offers user balance verification. Figures are loaded dynamically (not readable), so latest date and ratio not captured. About page mentions 'Top-level Audits of Hacken' but no Hacken PoR report was read, so auditor left null.

Incidents and regulator actions found

Security incidents

• No incident found in our limited search.

Regulator and court actions

• No regulator or court action found in our limited search.

What we could not verify

Web search budget exhausted: incidents and legal_actions empty = NOT searched, not 'none'. Operating entity, licences, PoR auditor/date/ratio, OAM not verified. Italy acceptance not stated. 2026-10-09 search (2 queries): no hack, regulator action or lawsuit found in results; a Bitunix self-published (hackernoon) item about Upbit restrictions in South Korea could not be verified from the fetched page and was not recorded.

Facts are as of 9 Oct 2026. We ran a limited number of searches per exchange, so an empty list is not proof that nothing happened. We did not check the Italian OAM register. Items from press or third parties are reports, not findings by an authority. If something here is wrong or out of date, send a correction with a source: corrections policy. Education only, not investment advice.

Sources

1. [1] Bitunix Restricted Regions and User Eligibility Notice accessed 2026-10-09
2. [2] Bitunix User Agreement accessed 2026-10-09
3. [3] ESMA interim MiCA CASP register CSV accessed 2026-10-09
4. [4] Bitunix fee structure accessed 2026-10-09
5. [5] Bitunix Proof of Reserve accessed 2026-10-09
6. [6] Bitunix About accessed 2026-10-09